Pages

Friday, October 28, 2022

#Venezuela's #oil partners head for the exit, forgoing unpaid debt, dividends

Venezuela: Venezuela's oil partners head for the exit, forgoing unpaid debt, Energy News, ET EnergyWorld
Venezuela's oil partners head for the exit, forgoing unpaid debt

Having to take a loss or relinquish unpaid debt has not stopped companies like France's TotalEnergies, Norway's Equinor, and Japan's Inpex from leaving. Their departure illustrates how US sanctions on the energy sector have made operating in the country with the most crude reserves untenable, leading to idle oilfields.

Venezuela's oil partners head for the exit, forgoing unpaid debt 

CABIMAS: Venezuela is allowing partners in state oil company PDVSA's joint ventures to leave - by selling their shares to others or returning them - so long as they forgo payment for past debts and unpaid dividends, four people close to the matter said.

Having to take a loss or relinquish unpaid debt has not stopped companies like France's TotalEnergies, Norway's Equinor, and Japan's Inpex from leaving. Their departure illustrates how US sanctions on the energy sector have made operating in the country with the most crude reserves untenable, leading to idle oilfields.

Eight foreign companies among PDVSA's 44 joint ventures have transferred or given up stakes since 2018. Another seven smaller firms no longer have a presence in Venezuela and 15 projects are inactive, even though those partners technically remain, an internal PDVSA document seen by Reuters showed.

"None of those stakes are recoverable at book value," said an oil executive whose firm left Venezuela by selling to a another company last year. "Among those remaining in the partnerships, few hope to ever recoup pending dividends or commercial debts from PDVSA."

More than three years of harsh US sanctions on PDVSA have restricted access to capital and cashflow and have limited the markets receiving Venezuelan oil, taking a toll on the mostly foreign minority stakeholders, their operations and workers.

Since TotalEnergies and Equinor in 2021 exited one of Venezuela's flagship oil upgrading projects, Petrocedeno, smaller firms have followed.

The French company reported a loss of $1.38 billion from transferring its 30% stake to a PDVSA unit. It received "a symbolic amount" for its assets, Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanne said at the time.

The transfer freed Total of past and future liabilities from its Venezuela projects. But dividends and debts owed by Petrocedeno to the partners also were wiped out, two people familiar with the matter said.

Inpex last year sold stakes in two Venezuelan assets to private equity firm Sucre Energy Group, and returned a stake in a third project to PDVSA. Accounts receivable and owed dividends were transferred to Sucre as part of the transaction, but at a heavily discounted value, a person involved in the transaction said.

The departures highlight the risks of doing business with cash-strapped PDVSA and the few legal avenues available to companies that have not been paid.

Equinor declined to disclose details of the transaction, but confirmed in an email the company has no remaining activity in the country. Inpex, Total and PDVSA did not reply to requests for comment.

WHAT ABOUT THE WORKERS?

Some companies losing staff in Venezuela or dealing with labor claims, including Venezuelan oil firm Suelopetrol and GPB Global Resources, have discovered PDVSA appointed new joint venture managers or took over their operations.

GPB Global Resources, a minority stakeholder in the Petrozamora joint venture, in September lost access to its fields with no official explanation given by PDVSA, sources and workers said.

"They left without paying us completely," said a worker from Petrozamora who asked not to be identified, referring to GPB. "Days ago, an official passed by and said the company had not respected its contract with PDVSA."

Suelopetrol declined to comment on talks with PDVSA, but said the company remains committed to Venezuela, with assets and staff in place. GPB Global Resources did not reply to a request for comment.

With companies and workers leaving almost en masse, the abandonment of oilfields is visible near Maracaibo Lake, among Venezuela's oldest producing region. Its oil output keeps falling, outages became routine and some workers are on the verge of starvation.

"A month ago, they tried to restart a small rig and it caused an explosion than sent crude to people's houses," said a neighbor of Maracaibo's Cabimas oilfield, his feet stained with oil.

From over 110,000 workers a decade ago, PDVSA's workforce has dropped to about 60,000 people, said Daniel Delgado, a union leader at the Tia Juana oilfield.

"We are risking our lives to get an oil barrel out by working in unsafe conditions, without proper equipment or medical assistance. It's a high price," Delgado said.

Between 2019 and 2021, PDVSA delivered oil cargoes to partners to reduce outstanding debt.

Eni and Repsol this summer received 3.6 million barrels in a temporary resumption of oil-for-debt, but nothing since then. Chevron has proposed to the US government it be allowed to recoup its debts through an expanded license, yet pending.

"Almost none of the companies that have left the country have been given that benefit," said an oil industry representative, who declined to be identified.

The departures have hit oil service providers and contractors the hardest, said the Venezuelan Petroleum Chamber, whose members fell to 300 from 500 in the last four years.

Venezuela last year fell short of reaching its oil production goal. And so far this year output has stalled at about 725,000 barrels per day (bpd), well below its year-end target of 2 million bpd.

To further increase production would require PDVSA to honor past debts, said Enrique Novoa, the Chamber's president, adding: "Sanctions also must be eased, at least partially."
Follow and connect with us on Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, Youtube


Monday, October 17, 2022

#Africa has a right to #Energy self-defence

Africa has a right to energy self-defence
"The hypocrisy and double standards that Africa suffers on these energy and climate issues seem endless."

600 million Africans do not have safe and stable access to electricity. African countries, which have contributed nothing to the climate disaster caused by the West and China, have a right to energy self-defence, says Joël Té-Léssia Assoko.

Africa has a right to energy self-defence

A coal-fired power plant on the Yangtze River in Nantong, China, in December 2018. © Utuku/ROPI-REA

One might be tempted to employ the epithet once applied to a chaotic French Socialist Party congress – "a drunken brawl in a Mexican brothel" – to describe the vaudeville that played out in New York at the end of September regarding the subject of climate finance.

Accused without further justification by the former US vice-president Al Gore of being "a climate denier", David Malpass, the head of the World Bank, clumsily defended himself.

No doubt a vestige of the language acrobatics employed during the Trump years, the former Treasury undersecretary (2017-2019) at first refused to expand on the human and fossil origins of global warming, merely stammering: "I am not a scientist."

To fund or not to fund

Of course, Malpass was quick to correct the record. He acknowledged that the "sharp increase in the use of coal, diesel, and heavy fuel oil" had negative consequences for the climate. But the damage had been done.

A dismayed chorus made up of NGOs and activists, supported by Gore, chanted calls for his resignation (a three-year-old monomania). Similar calls came from John Kerry and John Podesta, President Joe Biden's special envoy and senior climate adviser respectively. Malpass's term runs until the first half of 2024.

It is African countries that are being intimidated, excluded from funding and forced to give up this energy."

The climate lobby – whether acting out of calculation or conviction is basically irrelevant – stubbornly opposes the financing of any fossil fuel project, especially on the African continent, whatever the circumstances, and whatever the consequences.

Recurrent gambling

Africa has a lot to answer for in these recurring energy financing games. Data from the Global Energy Monitor shows that China's coal-fired power plants emit as many tonnes of CO2 in 36 hours as Morocco's do in an entire year.

All the coal-fired power plants installed since 2000 across the continent account for 13.8 GW of electrical capacity. This is barely half the coal-fired capacity that China added to its electricity mix in 2021 alone. And this was without the World Bank's endorsement, support or involvement.

Campaigns of intimidation

Yet it is African countries that are being intimidated, excluded from funding and forced to give up this energy.

Take gas, for example, another bête noire for activists and their sponsors. The combined capacity of all the gas-fired power plants being developed across Africa is only 65 GW. At the same time, Vietnam alone is developing 93 GW of gas-fired power.

The hypocrisy and double standards that Africa suffers on these energy and climate issues seem endless. In total, the continent has barely eight billion cubic metres (5.8m tonnes per year) of storage capacity for imported gas. As a result of the crisis in Ukraine, Latvia is building a 6.2 billion cubic metre storage facility in the harbour town of Skulte (population 900).

Prioritisation

Calls to make renewable energy financing 'the only priority' are part of a climate 'yakafokon' that ignores economic realities.

In The Climate Casino (2013), Nobel laureate William Nordhaus, a pioneer of climate macroeconomics, said: "Costs and benefits must be weighed in the balance when evaluating global warming options […]. It is not enough to say 'ecosystems are priceless".

The hypocrisy and double standards that Africa suffers on these energy and climate issues seem endless."

"Tackling climate change will require a huge pipeline of impact projects and a coordinated effort to finance these projects", as well as "sound diagnostics, new uses of technology and ambitious prioritisation", Malpass said in October 2021.

This has not stopped the World Bank from mobilising a record $31.7 billion in 2021-2022 "to help countries face climate change". This is 19% more than the previous record, which was set just one year earlier. Is this climate denial?

What absurd cost-risk/cost-benefit comparison could justify depriving the African continent of fossil fuels to supposedly preserve the planet's balance?

The Europeans have hastily reopened their coal-fired power stations to heat their homes this winter. Incidentally, it was not an Angolan minister but rather the British energy secretary who, in April, promised to deregulate the sector in order to extract "every last drop" of oil from the North Sea.

Meanwhile, 600 million Africans do not have safe and stable access to electricity. African countries, which have contributed nothing to the climate disaster caused by the West and China, have a right to energy self-defence.

There is no doubt that drastic measures must be imposed to mitigate the impact of climate change. But the obvious targets of this policy are not in Africa. Try looking in the mirror instead.


See the whole post on Africa Report here:

Twitter: @MasterEnergyRSS